Natural disasters have become so expensive that the Federal Government
shares in the economic risk. Forecasting this risk is therefore a significant
issue.
Insurance coverage for losses resulting from natural disasters is typically
less than 20 percent of the total loss, because of limited participation
in voluntary insurance coverage. The remainder of the dollar losses are
covered by the Federal Government through emergency allocations, the amount
of which can increase the national debt. As a result of Hurricane Andrew,
where the losses exceed 25 billion dollars, the U.S. Congress is examining
the feasibility of establishing a National "insurance" fund from
which uninsured losses can be paid when natural disasters strike. Forecasts
of future losses based on traditional interpretations of available data
produce highly variable results and seemingly yield few patterns. A new
method developed by USGS scientists addresses the issue of forecasting
the size and number of national disasters and their attendant losses.

Above - Natural disasters represent the intersection of two sets: nature
and population. As the population continues to grow, so does the area of
intersection, leading to costlier and deadlier disasters.
|

Above - Natural disasters are a "growth" industry. Since
the 1960s, economic losses from natural disasters on a global scale have
tripled, while insured losses have quintupled. (after Berz, 1992, Natural
Hazards, 5, 95-102)
|